Effects of Long-Term Straw-Return Modes on Soil Organic Carbon Content and Carbon Footprint in Wheat–Maize Rotation System

PDF Review History Discussion

Published: 2024-11-19

Page: 682-702


Medhn Berhane *

Key Lab of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China and Mekelle Soil Research Center, Tigray Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 492, Mekelle, Ethiopia.

Yunuo Li

Key Lab of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.

Binbin Cao

Key Lab of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.

Huili Zhao

Key Lab of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.

Peng Ning

Key Lab of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China and Heyang Field Station of Agricultural Environment and Farmland Conservation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Fuping, Shaanxi, China.

Xiaohong Tian

Key Lab of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China and Heyang Field Station of Agricultural Environment and Farmland Conservation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Fuping, Shaanxi, China.

Jianglan Shi

Key Lab of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Straw return is widely applied in China to achieve sustainable grain production. However, inappropriate farm practices can increase greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and reduce soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration, thereby increasing the carbon footprint (CFP) and affecting soil fertility and climate change. A 10-year experiment was conducted to evaluate and quantify the effects of straw management on SOC, crop yield, and CFP under a winter wheat–summer maize rotation in the Guanzhong Plain. The experiment involved seven straw-return modes, namely high wheat stubble retention and chopped maize straw return (WH-MC), high wheat stubble retention and chopped maize straw return with sub-soiling every two years (WH-MM), high wheat stubble retention and no maize straw return (WH-MN), both chopped wheat and maize straw return (WC-MC), chopped wheat and maize straw return with sub-soiling every two years (WC-MM), chopped wheat straw return and no maize straw return (WC-MN), and a control with no return of either wheat or maize straw (WN-MN). The results indicate that SOC change, crop yield, and CFP were significantly influenced by the straw-return mode in the annual wheat–maize season. SOC sequestration rate was positively correlated with cumulative plant-derived C input, which ranged from 29.4 Mg C ha−1 in WN-MN to 100.7 Mg C ha−1 in WH-MC. Of all the studied treatments, WH-MC produced the highest grain yield and lowest CFP, which were 26% higher and 20.5% lower than those of the control, respectively. Grain yield and CFP in the individual seasons; WC-MN (by 31.8 and 25%) in the wheat season and WH-MC (by 24.6 and 21.1%), WH-MM (by 23.5 and 21%), respectively and WC-MN (by 20% only grain) in the maize season at (P<0.05) produced a significantly higher compared to the no straw return treatment. Annual GHG emissions were highest in the WC-MM treatment and lowest in WH-MN. Therefore, WH-MC found to be the most suitable straw-return for lowering CFP and enhancing crop yield and SOC sequestration. However, from perspective of the coordinated development of agriculture and the livestock industry, it is necessary to remove some straw for animal feed and fuel; so WH-MN produced optimum yield and maintained SOC stock with low GHG emissions. This study can help to improve sustainable agricultural productivity and addressing climate change by lowering atmospheric concentration of GHGs in the future.

Keywords: Soil organic carbon sequestration, straw-return mode, crop yield, carbon footprint, greenhouse gas emission, diesel


How to Cite

Berhane, M., Li, Y., Cao, B., Zhao, H., Ning, P., Tian, X., & Shi, J. (2024). Effects of Long-Term Straw-Return Modes on Soil Organic Carbon Content and Carbon Footprint in Wheat–Maize Rotation System. Asian Journal of Research and Review in Agriculture, 6(1), 682–702. Retrieved from https://jagriculture.com/index.php/AJRRA/article/view/143

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.