Effect of Ethyl Methane Sulphonate and Dimethyl Sulphate on Some Growth Characters of Senna occidentalis

PDF

Published: 2021-03-08

Page: 23-31


Azza A. Tawfik *

Department of Horticulture (Floriculture), Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

G. G. Mostafa

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.

M. S. Gad

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Coffee senna, Cassia occidentalis Linn. is a perennial plant with important medicinal values. It grows throughout the tropics and subtropics and widely consumed by animals and human and used in several traditional medicines to cure many diseases. This research has been conducted to study the effect of two chemical mutagens on vegetative and flowering growth. To achieve this aim, seeds of Cassia occidentalis were soaked in boiled water for 18 h, where the temperature decreased gradually to room temperature. Then the seeds were soaked in ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS) at 0, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000 ppm and dimethyl sulphate (DMS) at 200, 400, 800, 1600 and 3200 ppm for 6 h where the control seeds remained in the water for the same period of soaking. Seeds were sown in 25cm plastic pots containing a soil mixture of clay and sand (1:1, v/v). Data was recorded on seed germination percentage, plant height, stem diameter, number of branches, number of leaves, fresh and dry weights of the plants. The statistical analysis revealed that significant effects have been observed on some growth characters.  Seeds treated with high concentrations of dimethyl sulphate (1600 and 3200 ppm) did not germinate. All the treatments used slightly decreased the pollen viability compared to the control and flowers of the all plants treated with 200 ppm DMS were fell before the maturity of the anther. Using dimethyl sulphate (DMS) at 200 and 400 ppm significantly decrease the number of inflorescences per plant compared to the control in both generations.

Keywords: Cassia occidentalis, chemical mutagens, EMS, fedegoso, DMS, mutation breeding.


How to Cite

Tawfik, Azza A., G. G. Mostafa, and M. S. Gad. 2021. “Effect of Ethyl Methane Sulphonate and Dimethyl Sulphate on Some Growth Characters of Senna Occidentalis”. Asian Journal of Research and Review in Agriculture 3 (1):23-31. https://jagriculture.com/index.php/AJRRA/article/view/39.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Holm L, Doll J, Holm E, Pancho J, Herberger J. World Seed: natural Histories and distribution. John Wiley & Sons. Ink. 1997;166.

Yadav JP, Arya V, Yadav S, Panghal M, Kumar S, Dhankhar S. Cassia occidentalis L.: A review on its ethnobotany, phytochemical and pharmacological profile. Fitoterapia. 2010;81(4):223-230.

Mahanthesh MC, Manjappa AS, Sherikar AS, Disouza JI, Shinde MV. Biological activities of cassia occidentalis linn: a systematic review. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2019;8(9):100-117.

Manikandaselvi S, Vadivel V, Brindha P. Review on nutraceutical potential of Cassia occidentalis L.–an Indian traditional medicinal and food plant. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2016;37(2):141-146.

Kharkwal MC, Pandey RN, Pawar SE. Mutation breeding for crop improvement. In Plant breeding. Springer, Dordrecht. 2004;601-645.

Toker C, Yadav SS, Solanki IS. Mutation breeding in Lentil: An ancient crop for modern times. Chapter. 2007;13:209–224.

Broertjes C. (Ed.). Application of mutation breeding methods in the improvement breeding methods in the improvement of vegetatively propagated crops. Elsevier. 2012;V2(2).

Tawfik AA, Mostafa GG, Alfrmawy AM, Gad MS. Evaluation of Genetic variation in mutants of senna occidentalis using protein pattern and RAPD Markers. Biotechnology. 2011;10:94-100.

Raina A, Laskar RA, Khursheed S, Amin R, Tantray YR, Parveen K, Khan S. Role of mutation breeding in crop improvement-past, present and improvement-past, present and future. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture. 2016;1-13.

Steel RGDS, Torrie JH. Principles of procedures of statistics. MC. Graw-Hill International Book Company 3rd Ed London. 1982;633.

Hoffmann RJ. Genetic effects of dimethyl sulphate, diethyl sulphate, and related compounds. Mutation Research/ Reviews in Genetic Toxicology. 1980;75(1):63-129.

Snustad DP, Simmons MJ. Principles of Genetics. 4th ed. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J; 2006.

Roychowdhury R, Tah J. Chemical mutagenic action on seed germination and related agro-metrical traits in M1 Dianthus generation Current Botany. 2011;2(8):19-23.

Emrani SN, Arzani A, Saeidi G. Seed viability, germination and seedling growth of canola (Brassica napus L.) as influenced by chemical mutagens. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(59):12602-12613.

Dhakshanamoorthy D, Selvaraj R, Chidambaram A. A physical and chemical mutagenesis in Jatropha curcas L. to induce variability in seed germination, growth and yield traits. Rom.J.Biol.Plant Biol. 2010;55(2):113-125.

Singh R, Kole CR. Effect of mutagenic treatments with EMS on germination and some seedling parameters in mung bean. Crop Res. 2005;30(2):236-240.

Padavai P, Dhanavel D. Effect of EMS, DES and colchicine treatment in soybean. Crop Res. 2004;28(1, 2 & 3):118-120.

Yadav RDS. Effect of mutagens on mitotic index, seedling vigour and chlorophyll mutation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). J. Nuclear Agric. Bio. 1987;16(1):13-17.

Micke A, Donini B. Induced mutations. In: Hayward MD, Bosemark NO, Romagosa I (eds) plant breeding: principles and prospects. Chapman & Hall, London. 1993;53–62.

Muehlbauer FJ, Slinkard AE. Genetics and breeding methodology. In: Webb C, Hawtin GC (eds) Lentils, CAB International, Farnham Royal, Slough, UK. 1981;69–90.

Lal SD, Danu NS, Seth JN. Induction of mutations in iris (Iris Kumaonesis) through gamma- rays and the chemical mutagen - ethyl methane sulphate. Progressive Horticulture. 1985;17(2):136-141.

El- Torky MG. Effect of EMS (Ethyl methane sulphonate) on variegation and some other horticultural traits in Euonymus japonicus, Linn. Alex J. Agric. Res. 1992;37(1):249- 260.

Singh BD. Mutations in crop improvement. In: Singh, B.D. (ed) Plant breeding, principles and methods, Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana. 2005;698–731.

Rapp RA, Wendel JF. Epigenetics and plant evolution. New Phytol. 2005;168:81–91.

Sega GA. A review of the genetic effects of Ethyl methane sulfonate. Mutation Research. 1984;134(2-3):113-142.

Basu SK, Acharya SN, Thomas JE. Genetic improvement of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) through EMS induced mutation breeding for higher seed yield under western Canada prairie conditions. Euphytica. 2008;160: 249–258.

Osorio J, Fernandez-Martinez J, Mancha M, Garces R. Mutant sunflowers with high concentration of saturated fatty acid in the oil. Crop Sci. 1995;37:739-742.

Parry MA, Madgwick PJ, Bayon C, Tearall K, Hernandez-Lopez A, Baudo M, Rakszegi M, Hamada W, Al-Yassin A, Ouabbou H, Labhilili M, Phillips AL. Mutation discovery for crop improvement. J. Exp. Bot. 2009;60:2817-2825.

Rowland GG. An EMS-induced low linoleic acid mutant in McGregor flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 1991;71:393-396.

Van Harten AM. Mutation Breeding: Theory and practical applications. Cambridge University Press, London; 1998.